Micrograph of the Month: Bits of Bones
For
the past few weeks I have been revisiting some old slides from the TP
excavation area at Catalhoyuk. I collected these samples in
2004, and they were some of the first that I worked on for my
PhD. At the time I found them a bit disappointing, as there is a
lot of bioturbation and erosion going on in this part of the
site, which means that trying to reconstruct activities using
microstratigraphic analysis is difficult. The TP area is located
very close to the surface of the mound, so despite the fact that these
are the youngest deposits, the preservation is nowhere near as good as
the earlier, deeply buried deposits. In the end I focused more on the
South and 4040 areas, with the TP samples being used as a brief
comparison of how different the taphonomic processes are in different
parts of the site. Which brings me on to this month's photos! I was
contacted by Kamilla
PawÅowska who is conducting zooarchaeological analysis in the TP area, and is investigating the taphonomy of the animal bones. We are now working together to see how the data from micromorphology can help understand the taphonomic processes inferred from animal bones. So I am doing a more detailed analysis of these slides, focusing specifically on bone inclusions. Here we can see 3 different bone fragments. At the top is a long 'splinter' of bone
about 100mm long and 1mm wide. The surface is very 'cracked', and the
ends are rounded and fragmenting. In the middle is a small bone fragment that has been weathered to a sub-rounded shape, less than 1mm at its
widest point. These fragments are tiny, and would not be seen during
routine recovery of bone. The deposits are full of these tiny, highly weathered fragments. The lowermost image shows a slightly larger fragment of bone, that has less 'cracking' on the surface, but is degrading in other ways. The circular features are called haversian canals, tiny little tubes found within bone. In this
example they are highly weathered, and we can see at the end of the bone
how it is fragmenting in situ, producing all those tiny fragments that
are found throughout the sediment. These examples are just some of the many different taphonomic processes that are impacting the bones in these middens, and highlight how micromorphology can be used to shed light on other lines of evidence in archaeology.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete